Referral partners: how the arrangement actually works.

The email is short. Your client forwards a Google review from someone who was never a customer, or from a competitor, or from an ex-employee still angry about the exit. You flag it, because you run their web presence and this is their web presence. Days later Google replies with the sentence everyone in this line of work can recite: no policy violation found.

Now you write the follow-up, and you have nothing to put in it. You did the right thing through the official channel, the channel said no, and the person reading your message pays you monthly to make exactly this sort of problem disappear. Nothing in that exchange makes you look competent.

Google's own blog reported that it blocked or removed more than 240 million policy-violating reviews in 2024, along with more than 12 million fake Business Profiles. Enforcement at that volume has to be automated, which is why a single rejection reads as arbitrary. Your client does not see a classifier making a call. They see you losing.

The two main shapes

Most partner pages in this category end at a form and a promise that terms will be discussed. The form tells you nothing about what you are actually signing up to. The two options here are not two payment methods. They differ on one axis, and that axis decides everything else: who owns the client relationship, and who carries the risk.

Route one, referral. The client stays ours. You make the introduction, we do the work, the client pays us, and we pay you. You write no scope, chase no invoice, and carry no exposure if the client goes quiet on payment. The trade is the other side of the same coin: you do not set the price, you are not in the room for the delivery conversation, and what you earn has a ceiling. The standard fee, cap and duration are written in the public referral terms, and any custom arrangement is agreed in writing before your client hears our name.

Route two, wholesale. The client stays yours. You buy at the partner rate, sell at whatever you decide, and keep the difference. Your margin has no ceiling. You own the relationship, the reporting and the invoice, which also means you carry the risk that the client pays you late or not at all, and you do the account management that route one hands to us. We never contact your client, and that is a published policy rather than a courtesy.

Most people know which of those two they are within about ten seconds, because the question underneath it is simply whether you want to own the client or hand them over. Pricing on both is custom. There is no rate card to send you, because the number depends on what you would actually be sending, so it gets set on a call and then written down.

The one fixed figure worth knowing going in: direct retail is $450 per review, billed after Google confirms the removal. That is the public price your client can find without you, which makes it the ceiling rather than the target, and a reasonable place to anchor your own.

What the rest of the market pays

Our open referral program sits at the most common benchmark below: 10%, for 12 months. For anything beyond that, turning up to the call with the practitioner benchmarks already in your head is worth having. Agency consultants who benchmark this put the most common referral rate at 10% of revenue, with 5% next. Twelve month caps are typical, and a step-down shows up often: 10% in year one, 5% in year two, then nothing. The same consultants note that agencies paying in perpetuity tend to regret it, usually around the point where they are still paying for an introduction nobody remembers making.

Marketing agency fees commonly run 5% to 15% of first project or contract value. Freelancers sit wider, 5% to 30%. None of this is survey-grade data. It is what people who do this for a living say when asked, and it is enough to keep a conversation from opening somewhere absurd.

Your name travels with the referral

The reason most of these partnerships never produce a single case has nothing to do with the fee. A referral is a loan of your judgment. If the vendor is slow, or vague about what it is doing, or turns up in your client's inbox three weeks later pitching SEO, that lands on you. You picked them.

Which makes the terms about behaviour more load-bearing than the terms about money:

• Accept or decline within 24 hours. You are never stuck telling a client you are waiting to hear back from someone.
• Median 4 days to removal, range 3 to 7. Measurable against your own cases.
• We do not contact your client and we do not compete with you for them. Published policy, not a concession you have to negotiate.
• Mutual NDA on every partnership, both directions.
• 0 of 1,427 removed reviews have come back, and a lifetime re-removal warranty is written into every invoice.

Taking a cut from someone who trusts you

The second objection is quieter and rarely said out loud: charging a commission on a client who hired you to be on their side feels like a conflict. It is one, unless you handle it the way your profession already handles it. Disclose the fee before the introduction. Put it in the engagement letter or the scope, not in a message afterwards. Never take payment before your client has actually paid. Bolting a fee on after the fact is what turns an ordinary arrangement into something you would rather your client never discovered.

Plenty of people read that and decline the fee entirely, because being the person who fixed it is the whole return. Defensible, and it changes nothing about how the case gets handled.

The three things your client has been warned about

Buyers in this category get taught to watch for the same three signals, and they are the right three.

Anyone guaranteeing removal of any review. We do not. Rating-only reviews, a star with no text, sit outside what we do, and we say so before you ask. What we publish is the record instead: 1,427 reviews removed between January and May 2026, with a 100% result on reviews that contain text. We tell you inside 24 hours whether we are taking a case. The guarantee is financial rather than predictive, so if we take it and it stays up, no invoice is issued.

Large upfront fees before anyone has looked at the case. There are none, on either route. An invoice exists only after Google confirms the removal.

Anyone claiming insiders at Google. Walk away, and that includes walking away from us if you ever hear it here. We have no contacts inside Google and we do not imply otherwise. What we say about the method is that it is a proprietary, direct removal process, and we publish nothing beyond that. Weigh an undisclosed method as a risk if you like. It sits against an invoice that only arrives on success, which puts most of that risk on our side of the table.

Attorneys: the fee is the wrong instrument

Defamation lawyers get asked about platform removal constantly and mostly do not do it, because a demand letter and a Google policy queue are unrelated machinery. The referral is obvious. The commission is not.

ABA Model Rule 7.2(b) provides that a lawyer shall not "give anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services". Exceptions are narrow, and the one people reach for is the non-exclusive reciprocal referral agreement, which has to stay non-exclusive and be disclosed to the client. The Model Rules are adopted state by state with variations, so the rule that binds you is your state's version, not this paragraph.

Direction of payment matters too. A fee flowing to you from a vendor you steered a client toward raises its own questions about independent professional judgment, separate from 7.2(b) entirely.

So we do not offer attorneys a commission. Two things we do offer: a reciprocal, non-exclusive arrangement where cases move in both directions and no money changes hands, or a straight hand-off where you pass the client our direct line and stay out of the economics completely. Both work. Neither needs a memo to your ethics counsel.

Two less obvious shapes

Neither of the two routes above fits everyone, and two other arrangements come up often enough to name.

Overflow, if you already sell removal yourself. Most of this category runs on Google's standard flagging tool, which is why so many providers stall on reviews that contain text and end up telling a client the request was denied. That is the exact category where our result is 1,427 of 1,427. If you already sell removal and have a pile of cases your process could not close, send those. You keep the client, you keep your brand on it, and nothing obliges you to route everything through us, only the cases you could not finish. This is peer wholesale rather than agency resale, and it is the arrangement we get asked about least and would take most readily.

Bundled, if removal sits inside a retainer. Some partners never show removal as a line item at all. It goes into a monthly retainer and the client sees one number. If that is you, the thing you need from us is not the lowest possible rate, it is a predictable one, because an unpredictable cost inside a fixed retainer is what turns a good month into a bad one. Say that on the call and we will price for predictability instead of pricing for the floor. Those are different conversations and they end at different numbers.

How to start

No application form, no partner tier, no qualification call dressed up as an interview. Send one case. Within 24 hours we tell you whether we are taking it and which route fits how you already bill. On route one, terms get written down before your client hears our name.

The operator entity is Carplo s.r.o., registered in the Czech Republic. Coverage is the US, Canada, UK and EU, in English. Payment by SEPA, wire or stablecoin, always after confirmed removal. For the fulfilment mechanics in more depth, read the white-label primer, or what works after Google rejects a flag.